UKIP are exploiting the trauma felt by victims of the Rotherham child sex abuse in a poster for the police commissioner election in South Yorkshire taking place in 2 days time.
The election was called following the resignation of the incumbent who has been held partially culpable (by some) for the failure to prevent 1,400 cases of sex abuse in Rotherham..
The posters, which will be displayed across South Yorkshire up until polling day, states that there are “1,400 reasons why you should not trust Labour again”.
As far as accusations in political posters go, this is as aggressive and uncompromising as they come.
As regular readers know, attack ads only work when the target audience ALREADY hold a point of view; if you’re trying to use an attack ad to seed an idea, it will backfire 99% of the time.
So, the UKIP campaign must be fairly confident that prospective supporters and undecided voters hold the Labour Party – not just the previous holder of the office – responsible for the crimes committed in Rotherham.
I would be incredibly surprised if that were the case and I suspect that this will be a classic case of an attack ad that misjudges the mood of the floating voter.
The TUC have produced a brilliant retro-style poster promoting the March and rally being held in central London today to protest about wage inequality, the cost of living and earnings for the lease well off.
The poster evokes the trade union spirit that was portrayed in the recent movie box office hit Pride.
The visual language and copy is brilliantly righteous and compelling and gives the viewer a sense that the movement is on the side of the many.
It also presents the rally as something that will have a carnival, festival style atmosphere and not just another dry political event.
I’m not sure who produced it, but they could design my silk protest banner any day.
The focus of the Labour Party’s communication activity has now pivoted from defence against UKIP to attack on the old foe that is the Conservative Party.
The lines of attack are now familiar and will become more so as we move ever closer towards polling day in May next year.
What is new is that Labour have created a brand logo for their attack. Creating a singular visual point of consistency which encapsulates the values of an organisation and lodges itself into the minds of an audience is hardly a new practice, but it’s fairly unusual to create one for an opponent.
It seems like a smart move to me and it will be interesting to see if it’s something that lasts beyond conference season.
The Labour Party’s line of attack against UKIP during their conference in Doncaster is “UKIP: more Tory than the Tories”.
The aim of the communications is to remind people in Labour’s heartlands who have a deep and visceral aversion to the Conservative Party that a flirtation with UKIP is tantamount to getting into bed with Margaret Thatcher.
These ads are aimed squarely at the working class in the midlands and north who might be tickled by Farage’s brand of anti-elitism and pub populism.
I’m not a fan of the strap line – it just reads like it’s been written by a Labour spokesperson. It’s void of humanity and is not the language of everyday speech.
The strategy, however, is sound enough.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) have released a video promoting their (as yet unrecognised) state and militant organisation.
The 13-minute long video is professionally shot and edited, and shows a group of young men – including those from Britain and Australia – holding weapons and reciting militant Islamist slogans and passages from the Qur’an.
The aim of the video is to encourage young, western Muslims to travel to Iraq and Syria and become part of their jihad (struggle).
The creative strategy for persuading potential recruits is to portray members of the militia as relatively normal people who the audience could associate themselves with.
The setting for the majority of the video is a verdant, thriving and bright forest; this is to imply that the environment recruits could look forward to would be comfortable and relaxed. Occasionally there is footage showing groups of young men, often in balaclavas toting machine guns and seemingly having a good time; the sense of camaraderie and solidarity will no doubt appeal to the audience.
The video is however very long indeed and there isn’t enough interesting things happening or being said to justify this duration. The speeches often seem slightly confused, incoherent and are not particularly inspiring.
Nevertheless, I suspect the mere fact that the organisation has produced a professional looking video that speaks directly to the small group of people who were considering making the very dangerous trip will be inspiration enough for the potential recruits.
The Economist newspaper published today has an article on political advertising that is worth a read.
And in case you don’t make it all the way through, I’ve kindly pulled out the key quotation above.
Don’t mention it.